20 Must-Watch Movies Similar to ‘Judgment at Nuremberg’

Witness for the Prosecution is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg, as both movies delve into captivating courtroom dramas that keep the audience on the edge of their seats. While Judgment at Nuremberg explores the aftermath of World War II and the Nuremberg trials, Witness for the Prosecution takes us on a thrilling murder trial journey. Both films feature exceptional performances from their casts, with powerful portrayals from actors such as Spencer Tracy and Burt Lancaster in Judgment at Nuremberg, and Tyrone Power and Marlene Dietrich in Witness for the Prosecution. However, what sets Witness for the Prosecution apart is its clever plot twists and surprises, making it a must-watch for anyone who enjoys a riveting courtroom mystery. So if you loved the intense legal battles and emotional depth of Judgment at Nuremberg, Witness for the Prosecution will definitely satisfy your craving for suspense and intrigue.

The Midnight Man is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg as both movies showcase the versatility and brilliance of Burt Lancaster. In Judgment at Nuremberg, Lancaster delivers an extraordinary cinematic performance as Ernst Janning, a character that challenges our mentality and morality. Similarly, in The Midnight Man, Lancaster plays a former police detective turned security guard who investigates the murder of a student. While the genres of these movies differ, with Judgment at Nuremberg being a drama and The Midnight Man a crime mystery, both films demonstrate Lancaster's ability to captivate audiences with his compelling presence on screen. Furthermore, The Midnight Man is elevated by its complex tale of murder and blackmail, and the authentic setting of Clemson College adds an extra layer of intrigue to the story. So, if you've enjoyed Burt Lancaster's exceptional performance in Judgment at Nuremberg, you should definitely watch The Midnight Man for another engaging and suspenseful experience.

Best Wishes for Tomorrow takes us back to the aftermath of World War II, just like Judgment at Nuremberg. However, while the latter explores the Nazi war crimes trial in Germany, the former delves into a Japanese Class B war criminal's quest for redemption. Despite the intriguing premise, Best Wishes for Tomorrow falls short of delivering a captivating narrative. The film fails to fully explore the complexities of the protagonist's story, opting for a simplistic and apologist portrayal instead. Unlike Judgment at Nuremberg, which skillfully balances history and fiction, Best Wishes for Tomorrow misses the mark by glossing over crucial moments of human self-awareness and resorting to sentimental outpourings. The missed opportunity to delve into the character's ambivalence and the filmmakers' choice to fast-forward proceedings leaves the audience craving a more engaging and poignant portrayal.

His Majesty O'Keefe is a delightful adventure film that takes us on a journey to the South Pacific. Just like in Judgment at Nuremberg, we have Burt Lancaster in the lead role, but this time he trades his judge's robe for a captain's hat. The plot revolves around Captain David O'Keefe, who finds himself on Yap Island after a mutiny, where he discovers the potential for making money by harvesting coconuts. However, he soon realizes that his intentions are not welcomed by the natives and face competition from German businessmen. While the film has a decent theme at its core, it struggles to find a balance between being a swashbuckling adventure and a commentary on capitalism's corrupting influence. The pacing is a bit uneven, but the film manages to hold our interest thanks to the beautiful scenery and Lancaster's charismatic performance.

"The Kentuckian" is a charming film that takes you back to the 1820s, a period in American history that is often overlooked in movies. Burt Lancaster plays an outdoorsman who is determined to make a better life for himself and his young son in Texas. The film explores themes of family, perseverance, and the clash between civilization and the untamed wilderness. Unlike the intense courtroom drama of "Judgment at Nuremberg," "The Kentuckian" is a more lighthearted and adventurous tale. While it may not be one of Lancaster's most remarkable performances, the film stands out for its unique setting and its portrayal of a father-son relationship. So if you're looking for a change of pace from the war crimes trial setting, give "The Kentuckian" a watch and get transported to a different era in American history.

Broken Lance, released in 1954, is a captivating movie that shares some similarities with the timeless classic Judgment at Nuremberg. While Broken Lance is set in the 1880s Arizona, it explores the intricate dynamics of a dysfunctional family, much like Judgment at Nuremberg delves into the aftermath of World War II. Both films showcase the complexity of family relationships and the conflicts that arise within them. Spencer Tracy, who delivers a remarkable performance in Judgment at Nuremberg, once again shines in Broken Lance as the father figure. Interestingly, Richard Widmark appears in both films, playing contrasting roles that demonstrate his versatility as an actor. Though the two movies differ in their historical context and genres, Broken Lance is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg in its exploration of family dynamics and the profound impact of personal choices. So, if you enjoyed the thought-provoking nature of Judgment at Nuremberg, Broken Lance is definitely a movie worth watching.

From Here to Eternity is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg because both films explore the complex human emotions and moral dilemmas in the aftermath of war. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the trials of war criminals in post-WWII Germany, From Here to Eternity delves into the lives of soldiers stationed in Hawaii just before the attack on Pearl Harbor. Both movies showcase exceptional ensemble casts, with standout performances from Burt Lancaster in both films. However, From Here to Eternity stands out for its quick and effective establishment of characters and plot lines, thanks to director Fred Zinnemann's confident and intelligent direction. The film weaves multiple storylines seamlessly, drawing the audience into the lives of the characters and creating an emotional connection.

Run Silent Run Deep is a captivating movie that takes you on an underwater journey filled with tension and suspense. Just like Judgment at Nuremberg, it showcases exceptional storytelling and attention to detail. The filmmakers of Run Silent Run Deep, led by the talented director Robert Wise, were sticklers for accuracy, making everything look and sound authentic. The film's one hour and 33 minutes runtime is reasonable, with no melodrama or bloat. The tension is genuine, and the storytelling is done in an efficient, no-frills style. The chemistry between Clark Gable and Burt Lancaster is electric, as they portray characters who butt heads but still manage to work together. The supporting cast is also top-notch, with all the performances being 100% believable. Even though it was released 57 years ago, the special effects in the movie are still reasonable and don't distract from the engaging scenario.

Castle Keep is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg in its unique perspective on war. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the aftermath of Nazi occupation in Germany and the war crimes trial, Castle Keep takes place during the Battle of the Bulge and centers around an anachronistic count who shelters American soldiers in his castle. Both movies delve into the complexities of war and its impact on individuals and society. However, Castle Keep brings a touch of surrealism and humor to the table, offering a refreshing and unconventional take on the genre. Directed by Sydney Pollack, Castle Keep, like Judgment at Nuremberg, stands out as a brave and timeless film that challenges the conventions of Hollywood standards. If you enjoyed the thought-provoking nature of Judgment at Nuremberg, Castle Keep is a must-watch for its unique perspective and strong cast, including the ever-compelling Burt Lancaster.

The Great Escape is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg because both movies take place during World War II and involve the struggle against the Nazis. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the aftermath of the war and the trial of Nazi war criminals, The Great Escape tells the thrilling story of Allied prisoners planning a daring escape from a German camp. Both films capture the tension and danger of the time period, but in different ways. Judgment at Nuremberg is a thought-provoking drama that explores the moral complexities of war crimes, while The Great Escape is an action-packed adventure that showcases the determination and ingenuity of the prisoners. Despite their differences, both movies offer a captivating glimpse into the human spirit and the fight for justice. If you enjoyed Judgment at Nuremberg, you should definitely watch The Great Escape for its thrilling storyline and stellar cast, including the iconic Steve McQueen.

All About Eve is a classic film that will keep you on the edge of your seat, just like Judgment at Nuremberg did. While Judgment at Nuremberg delves into the dark history of Nazi Germany and the aftermath of World War II, All About Eve takes a different route, exploring the cutthroat world of show business. Both films captivate their audiences with their intriguing plots and exceptional performances. In Judgment at Nuremberg, Spencer Tracy delivers a compelling performance as a judge presiding over a war crimes trial, while Bette Davis shines in All About Eve as Margo Channing, a seasoned Broadway star. These films prove that great acting knows no bounds, whether it is in the courtroom or on the stage. The similarities end there, as All About Eve takes a sharp turn into the realm of manipulation and ambition.

The Best Years of Our Lives holds a mirror up to Judgment at Nuremberg, showcasing the profound impact of war on individuals and their families. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the aftermath of Nazi occupation and the war crimes trial, The Best Years of Our Lives delves into the lives of three World War II veterans returning to the American Midwest. Both films provide a thought-provoking exploration of the challenges faced by those who have served their country and the lasting effects on their personal lives. The Best Years of Our Lives, released in 1947, serves as a remarkable time capsule, capturing the issues faced by military men returning from war in the mid-1940s. Its enduring power lies in its ability to resonate with audiences even after almost 60 years. The film's well-deserved Oscar wins, including Best Picture, reflect its status as a timeless classic.

The Apartment, released in 1960, is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg. Both films are set in the early 1960s and feature complex characters navigating challenging situations. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the aftermath of World War II and the war crimes trial of four Nazis, The Apartment tells the story of a Manhattan insurance clerk who lets executives use his apartment for trysts in an attempt to rise in the company. Despite their different genres (Drama and War for Judgment at Nuremberg, and Comedy, Drama, and Romance for The Apartment), both movies touch on themes of morality, sacrifice, and the choices people make. In Judgment at Nuremberg, the characters face the consequences of their actions during a war, while in The Apartment, the characters make questionable decisions in pursuit of their desires. The performances in both films are exceptional, with Spencer Tracy and Jack Lemmon delivering compelling portrayals.

Destination Gobi is a 1953 film that shares some similarities with the main movie, "Judgment at Nuremberg". While the main movie takes place in post-World War II Germany, Destination Gobi is set in the Gobi desert during the same time period. Both films explore the experiences of Americans in a foreign land during wartime. However, while "Judgment at Nuremberg" focuses on the aftermath of war crimes and the Nuremberg trials, Destination Gobi takes a different approach by following a group of US Navy specialists running a weather station in the Gobi desert. The film combines elements of adventure, drama, and comedy, and features an odd yet entertaining plot based on a true incident. With its engaging storyline and unique setting, Destination Gobi provides a fresh perspective on the challenges faced by Americans during World War II.

Take the High Ground! is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg in its exploration of the military and war themes. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the aftermath of World War II and the war crimes trial, Take the High Ground! delves into the experiences of soldiers during the Korean War. Both movies touch on the impact of war on individuals and society. However, while Judgment at Nuremberg delves deep into the moral and ethical questions surrounding war crimes, Take the High Ground! primarily explores the contrasting approaches of two drill sergeants in shaping recruits into soldiers. Despite their differences, both movies provide a thought-provoking look at the effects of war and military life. If you enjoyed the historical context and powerful performances in Judgment at Nuremberg, Take the High Ground! offers a unique perspective on the military experience during the Korean War.

"Time Limit" is reminiscent of "Judgment at Nuremberg" due to its focus on a military trial and the exploration of complex moral dilemmas. Both movies delve into the aftermath of war and the impact it has on individuals and societies. While "Judgment at Nuremberg" tackles the Nuremberg trials and the atrocities committed during World War II, "Time Limit" centers around a former prisoner of war during the Korean War who admits to collaborating with the enemy. Both films are thought-provoking and emotionally charged, challenging the audience to question notions of justice, loyalty, and personal responsibility. However, "Time Limit" distinguishes itself by its more intimate setting and its examination of the psychological toll of war on individuals. The film's sensitive portrayal of duty versus loyalty and its ability to present multiple sides of the equation make it an underrated gem that deserves more recognition.

"The Alamo" is a film that takes us back to 1836, when a small group of soldiers fought against a powerful army to protect the new Republic of Texas. It's a dramatic adventure that portrays the heroism and sacrifice of those involved. The movie features an all-star cast, including John Wayne as Davy Crockett, Richard Widmark as Jim Bowie, and Laurence Harvey as Colonel William Travis. The camaraderie and conflicts among these characters add depth to the story, as they come to understand the meaning of life and develop a mutual respect. The film truly comes alive during the spectacular battle scenes, where the Mexican raiding party, led by General Santa Anna, clashes with the defenders of the fort. The production is grand in scale, with impressive battles and an impeccable musical score by Dimitri Tiomkin. While "The Alamo" and "Judgment at Nuremberg" may seem like entirely different films, they share some similarities.

Flight from Ashiya is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg in terms of its historical context and the moral dilemmas faced by its characters. While Judgment at Nuremberg explores the aftermath of World War II and the trial of Nazis for war crimes, Flight from Ashiya takes us to Japan during a raging typhoon, where a flight crew attempts to rescue survivors of a shipwreck. Both movies delve into the hardships faced by individuals during times of crisis and the ethical decisions they must make. However, while Judgment at Nuremberg is a powerful drama with a gripping storyline, Flight from Ashiya falls short in terms of pacing and predictability. The flashbacks in Flight from Ashiya, although attempting to add depth to the characters, come across as trite and contrived. The film's old-fashioned and silly moments, coupled with some unintentionally amusing dialogue, prevent it from reaching the same level of impact as Judgment at Nuremberg.

The Actress takes us on a different journey than Judgment at Nuremberg, but it still manages to capture our attention. While the former explores the real-life experiences of actress/playwright Ruth Gordon, the latter delves into the trials of four Nazis judged for war crimes in occupied Germany. The Actress showcases a working-class father's career aspirations for his daughter, a storyline that sets it apart from the typical family career aspirations for a son. Spencer Tracy, in a role I've never seen him in before, delivers an amazing performance as a curmudgeon working-class father. The dialogue, with its hilarious one-liners, will resonate with anyone who has ever been embarrassed by their parents or heard them say, "Why did you ever have to be so different?" But what really elevates The Actress is the Mary Wickes moment, proving once again that she makes every movie better, even if she's only in it for less than 20 seconds.

Bad Day at Black Rock is reminiscent of Judgment at Nuremberg in its exploration of the aftermath of war and the impact it has on a community. While Judgment at Nuremberg focuses on the war crimes trial of Nazis in post-war Germany, Bad Day at Black Rock delves into the secrets and conspiracy of a small town in post-World War II America. Both movies highlight the tension and unease that lingers after the war, as well as the lengths people will go to protect their own interests. However, where Judgment at Nuremberg is a courtroom drama, Bad Day at Black Rock is a thrilling mystery, adding an extra layer of intrigue to the story. With its tight plot, memorable performances, and clever use of the wide screen to enhance the isolation of the town, Bad Day at Black Rock is a must-watch for fans of Judgment at Nuremberg who are looking for a gripping tale set in the aftermath of war.