14 Epic Movies Like Vikings That Will Leave You Breathless

Vikings: Valhalla is a worthy successor to Vikings, taking us on a new adventure 100 years later. While it may not reach the same heights as the original, it stands strong on its own. The show follows the exploits of Leif Erikson, Freydis, Harald Hardrada, and the Norman King William the Conqueror. Just like Vikings, it delves into the world of vikings, showcasing their battles, love affairs, and thirst for exploration. With an impressive runtime of 3060 seconds, it gives us even more time to immerse ourselves in this brutal and mysterious world. The cast, including Sam Corlett, Leo Suter, and Frida Gustavsson, breathes life into these characters, making us invested in their journeys. Vikings: Valhalla is a must-watch for fans of the original series, as it continues the saga in a captivating and thrilling way.

The Tudors is a captivating historical drama that shares similarities with Vikings. Both series transport us to a bygone era, immersing us in the lives of powerful figures and their tumultuous reigns. While Vikings takes us into the brutal and mysterious world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior and farmer with a yearning for exploration and raiding, The Tudors delves into the captivating reign and marriages of King Henry VIII. Both shows beautifully depict the complexities of their respective time periods, with stunning costumes, fiery acting, and an immersive soundtrack. However, where Vikings focuses on the gritty and violent world of the Vikings, The Tudors explores the opulence and political intrigue of the English court. The Tudors offers a unique perspective on history, albeit with some historical inaccuracies, and provides a fascinating portrayal of King Henry VIII's transformation from a handsome and charismatic ruler to a self-absorbed and ruthless monarch.

Samrat Ashok is reminiscent of Vikings because both movies delve into the world of historical heroes and kings. While Vikings explores the brutal and mysterious world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior, Samrat Ashok tells the life story of emperor Ashoka. Both movies showcase the struggles and triumphs of these powerful figures, offering a glimpse into their ambitions, battles, and love lives. However, there are some differences between the two. Vikings is a series with a runtime of 2640 seconds, while Samrat Ashok is a cinematic movie with a longer runtime of 9600 seconds. Additionally, Vikings is set in Ireland, while Samrat Ashok takes place in India. If you enjoyed the thrilling and captivating world of Vikings, you should definitely watch Samrat Ashok to immerse yourself in another epic tale of power, love, and battle.

Revenge of the Musketeers is reminiscent of Vikings because both movies fall under the action and adventure genres and share key topics such as sex scenes and kings. However, while Vikings takes us into the brutal and mysterious world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior and farmer, Revenge of the Musketeers is set in France during the twilight years of the musketeers. The plot revolves around Eloïse d'Artagnan, who suspects a plan to murder the king and seeks to prevent it while seeking revenge for her mother's murder. The movies differ in terms of setting, time period, and overall tone. Vikings has a more gritty and violent atmosphere, while Revenge of the Musketeers combines action and comedy. Despite their differences, fans of swashbucklers and Musketeer films should give Revenge of the Musketeers a chance, especially for its solid production, excellent cast, and fine direction.

Dragon Hunters is reminiscent of Vikings, the main_movie, in terms of its adventurous spirit and the portrayal of a hero on a mission. Both movies feature a protagonist who embarks on a quest against great odds, facing mythical creatures and battling for a noble cause. While Vikings explores the brutal and mysterious world of Viking warriors, Dragon Hunters takes us on a fantastic tale of two dragon hunters. However, Dragon Hunters distinguishes itself with its unique and fresh visual style, showcasing imaginative and jaw-dropping visuals that transport viewers into a fairytale-like world. The movie's characters, although not realistic, are visually appealing and complemented by awe-inspiring backgrounds. Additionally, Dragon Hunters introduces a blue, bunny-like mini-dragon that steals the show with its hilarious moments, reminiscent of the beloved Scrat from Ice Age.

Ironclad is a medieval epic that takes us back to thirteenth-century England, where a group of Knights Templar and a few of the Barons men fight to defend Rochester Castle against the tyrannical King John. While Vikings explores the world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior and farmer who yearns to explore and raid distant shores, Ironclad transports us to a different time and place, immersing us in the brutal and dangerous world of medieval England. Both movies share the common theme of men fighting for what they believe in, but Ironclad takes it a step further by showcasing intense and gruesome combat scenes that will leave you wincing at the bone-crunching, blood-squelching fights. Unlike Vikings, Ironclad is a cinematic experience that captures the essence of a medieval siege, delivering a highly competent and interesting historical drama.

Da Vinci's Demons takes us back in time to Florence during the early days of Leonardo Da Vinci. This series follows the young artist, inventor, and dreamer as he tries to change the future. Just like Vikings, Da Vinci's Demons is full of excitement and intrigue. The acting is superb, the dialog is well-written, and the setting is both beautiful and dark. However, while Vikings focuses on the world of Vikings and their exploration, Da Vinci's Demons delves into the life of a historical figure and his quest for greatness. The graphics in Da Vinci's Demons may not be as impressive as in Vikings, but it's a small detail in the grand scheme of things. If you enjoyed Vikings and are looking for another historical series with a touch of adventure, Da Vinci's Demons is definitely worth watching.

The Lost Legion takes us back to the ancient world following the fall of the Roman Empire. It tells the story of a Roman woman who hatches a plot to make her son the new Emperor and restore the former glory of the city. While Vikings and The Lost Legion may seem like two completely different worlds, they share a common thread: ambition. Both shows explore the lengths people will go to achieve power and greatness. Vikings takes us on a thrilling journey with Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior who yearns to explore and raid distant shores. In The Lost Legion, we witness a Roman woman's determination to reclaim her empire. However, the similarities end there. Vikings is a gripping series that captivates viewers with its character development, violence, drama, and mystery. On the other hand, The Lost Legion falls short in terms of acting and historical accuracy. Its bad script and acting make it a forgettable movie, lacking the depth and intrigue of Vikings.

Taras Bulba is reminiscent of Vikings in several ways. Both movies fall under the genre of action, drama, history, and war. They both depict a bygone era, with Vikings transporting us to the brutal world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior and farmer, while Taras Bulba takes us back to the 16th century, showcasing Ukraine's Cossack warriors defending their lands from the advancing Polish armies. Both movies have intense battle scenes and explore themes of heroism, patriotism, and the harsh realities of war. However, while Vikings is a series spanning multiple seasons, Taras Bulba is a cinema movie with a longer runtime. Despite their similarities, Taras Bulba provides a unique perspective on Russian history, highlighting the sacrifices and struggles of its characters. So if you've enjoyed the thrilling action and historical elements of Vikings, Taras Bulba is definitely worth a watch to delve into a different chapter of history with its own gripping tale of courage and resilience.

Baywatch is reminiscent of Vikings because both shows take us into a unique world filled with adventure and drama. While Vikings transports us to the brutal and mysterious world of Vikings, Baywatch takes us to the sunny beaches of Los Angeles. Both shows have their fair share of thrilling moments, but Vikings focuses more on the historical aspects of Viking warriors and their raids, while Baywatch centers around the daily lives of lifeguards dealing with personal dramas and fighting crime. Vikings, with its intense plot and character development, keeps us intrigued throughout the series, while Baywatch provides a more light-hearted and humorous experience. So, if you've enjoyed the thrilling escapades and character-driven storytelling of Vikings, you might find yourself entertained by the over-the-top adventures and comedic moments of Baywatch. Just be prepared for some laughable incidents and a lot of T & A along the way.

"Ranking of Kings" is reminiscent of "Vikings" in that both shows revolve around a central character who faces challenges due to their perceived limitations. In "Vikings," Ragnar Lothbrok is a Viking warrior and farmer who yearns to explore and raid distant shores, despite the doubts and obstacles he encounters. Similarly, in "Ranking of Kings," Prince Bojji is looked down upon by the people of the kingdom due to his inability to hear or speak, earning him the nickname "The Useless Prince." Both characters are underestimated by those around them, but they possess inner strength and determination that propel them forward. However, while "Vikings" is a live-action series filled with violence, drama, and mystery, "Ranking of Kings" is an animated series that blends elements of action, adventure, comedy, and fantasy. The charming and endearing nature of "Ranking of Kings" shines through, captivating viewers within the first few minutes.

Ponniyin Selvan: Part Two takes us on a captivating journey through the historic Chola empire of south India, as Arulmozhi Varman continues his quest to become Rajaraja I. With its gripping screenplay, intense action sequences, and emotionally charged performances, this movie keeps you engaged from start to finish. While the plot progression could have been faster, the film makes up for it with its attention to technicalities and authentic background score. The wonderful framing and brilliant shot making add to the overall cinematic experience. With splendid performances from the entire cast, Ponniyin Selvan: Part Two leaves a strong emotional impact. If you enjoyed Vikings, you'll definitely appreciate this sequel as it showcases a different era in history, while still providing the same level of excitement and grandeur.

Shadow is a Chinese cinema movie that takes us back in time to the Three Kingdoms era. In this visually stunning film, an army commander secretly trains a "shadow" to retake a city against the wishes of the king. Just like Vikings, Shadow brings us into a world of kings, deception, and wars. However, while Vikings focuses on the brutal and mysterious world of Ragnar Lothbrok, Shadow takes us to a Chinese royal court filled with intrigue and political maneuvering. The two movies share the common theme of a king and a commander, but their settings and cultures are vastly different. Vikings immerses us in the world of Vikings, while Shadow showcases the elegance and complexities of ancient Chinese society. So, if you're a fan of Vikings and want to explore a different historical era with breathtaking visuals, then Shadow is a must-watch.

Warrior, like Vikings, takes us on an adventure into a brutal and mysterious world. While Vikings explores the Viking era, Warrior immerses us in the Tong Wars of late 1800s San Francisco. Both shows dive deep into the history and culture of their respective time periods, giving us a glimpse into the lives of their characters. However, where Vikings focuses on the journey of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior, Warrior follows Ah Sahm, a martial arts prodigy from China who becomes a hatchet man for the most powerful tong in Chinatown. While Vikings is known for its violence and drama, Warrior shines with its sharp writing and realistic action sequences. The choreography is believable, unlike in Into The Badlands, and the storyline is captivating. Moreover, the sets and costumes in Warrior perfectly capture the late 1800s setting.